Positive
Impact of
QLink Technology
on Students with
Learning Disabilities at
NEW WAY SCHOOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing Procedure:
|
|
|
|
Two different
applications systems of CLARUS / QLink TECHNOLOGY, a family of devices developed
to neutralize the negative effects of EMF in the class room were used:
active, or "NON-PLACEBO" units (Group "A") and inactive, or "PLACEBO" units
(Group "B"). At the beginning of the first week, Group "A" systems were
placed throughout the school. At the beginning of the second week, Group
"B" systems replaced the Group "A" units. Group "A" systems were again
used for the third week and Group "B" units during the fourth week. The
following is a summary of teachers' records of specific "maladaptive" behaviors
during the testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Maladaptive Behavior
Event" Criteria |
GROUP "A" Coherent EMF
(Active Units) |
GROUP "B" Random EMF (Placebo
Units) |
%
Difference with Coherent vs.
Random EMF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Academic Criteria |
|
|
|
| Not on task |
67 |
128 |
-48% |
|
| Trouble following directions |
65 |
132 |
-51% |
|
| Work not completed |
22 |
42 |
-48% |
|
| Academic
Criteria Totals |
154 |
302 |
-49% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emotional Criteria |
|
|
|
| Irritability |
37 |
61 |
-39% |
|
| Outbursts |
23 |
55 |
-58% |
|
| Withdrawn |
15 |
17 |
-12% |
|
| Emotional
Criteria Totals |
75 |
133 |
-44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Criteria |
|
|
|
| Problems interacting with
PEERS |
43 |
41 |
5% |
|
| Problems interacting with
STAFF |
20 |
27 |
-26% |
|
| Social
Criteria Totals |
63 |
68 |
-7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Criteria |
|
|
|
| Hyperactivity |
60 |
79 |
-24% |
|
| Headaches |
17 |
18 |
-6% |
|
| Fatigue |
36 |
49 |
-27% |
|
| Physical Criteria Totals |
113 |
146 |
-23% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total
Reduction in all "maladaptive behaviors" |
405 |
649 |
-38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|